SourceFrame
ProductHow it WorksBrief TypesUse CasesFAQ

Brief typeUnderstand

Source Summary Brief

Summarizes the source set itself — what this collection of reading collectively says.

Here the pile of sources is the subject. No question is asked, so no answer is asserted: you get themes, the places where sources pull against each other, and what the set leaves open.

Free plan · No card required
Get the extension

This type usually starts from tabs you already have open.

Source Summary Brief

7 tabs captured

Across these seven sources, onboarding advice splits by whether the author sells the tooling.

  • Most sources measure activation in the first session source 1 source 3
  • Two sources contradict each other on checklist onboarding source 2 source 6
Answers
“What do these sources collectively say?”
Appears when
You choose Summary and leave the focus empty, or word it at the reading — “summarize these reports”.
Never does
Answers a question you didn’t ask, or resolves a tension between sources. It reports the disagreement.

The one distinction that matters

Is the subject your question, or the reading?

Both types run on the same source set and share the same citation and gap behavior. Only the subject differs — and it changes every section that follows.

Source Brief

Source Summary Brief · this page

The reading is the subject. The brief opens on an Overview of the set, then Key themes — no answer is asserted.

Versus

Source Brief

Your question is the subject. The brief is titled for it, and the first section commits to an Answer the sources support.

Inside the brief

Themes, tensions, open questions

Source Summary BriefV1 · Primary

Overview

Across these seven sources, onboarding advice splits by whether the author sells the tooling.

  • Most sources measure activation in the first session source 1 source 3
  • Two sources contradict each other on checklist onboarding source 2 source 6

Key themes

Activation is decided in the first session

Five of the six readable sources define activation inside session one, and treat later engagement as retention rather than onboarding source 1 source 3 source 5.

Personalization is recommended without evidence

Three sources recommend role-based onboarding paths; none report an outcome measurement source 2 source 4.

Who wrote it predicts what it recommends

Vendor-published sources favour tooling-led onboarding; practitioner write-ups favour removing steps source 2 source 6.

Tensions

Disputed:

Checklists: essential or a crutch

One source reports a 20% activation lift from checklists source 2; another argues they mask an unclear first action source 6. Both are retained.

Disputed:

Time-to-value: minutes or a week

The two benchmarks in the set measure different products and are not comparable source 3 source 5.

Open questions

  • Does role-based onboarding survive contact with a small support team?
  • What does activation mean for a product used weekly rather than daily?

Evidence gaps & caveats

2 OPEN
  • One site blocked extraction, so that source could not be read or cited.
  • No source in this set covers B2C onboarding.

Suggested next steps

  1. Add a practitioner write-up for weekly-use products to test the activation definition.

The corpus is the subject

Because no question is posed, the brief is free to describe the shape of the reading — including the fact that some sources are selling something.

  • source 2

    Vendor onboarding guide

    Perspective · advocacy
  • source 5

    Benchmark report

    Evidence · data-heavy

Source quality6 processed1 weak1 restricted

Section order is fixed

  1. Overview
  2. Key themes
  3. Tensions
  4. Open questions
  5. Evidence gaps & caveats
  6. Suggested next steps

How you get one

Usually starts in the browser, with tabs you already have open

Within Summary, your wording determines whether the question or the source set becomes the subject. Ask a question and you get a Source Brief; point at the reading and you get this one. The extension is the direct way to make tabs you’ve already read the subject.

Primary path · Extension

Route in
  1. Select tabs
  2. Summary mode
  3. Source Summary Brief

Leave the focus field empty, or write something that points at the reading rather than asking a question. The brief opens in the web app for reading, Ask and export.

Get the extension

What decides it

Summary · focus left empty
Source Summary Brief
Summary · “summarize these reports”
Source Summary Brief
Summary · a question as the focus
Source Brief
Comparison · wording that points at the sources
Source Comparison Brief

A brief holds a limited number of sources, so a focused set of tabs reads better than everything you have open.

Evidence behavior

Disagreement is content, not a defect

Tensions stay unresolved

When two sources conflict, both readings are kept with their citations. The brief doesn’t quietly average them.

Quality is counted

Weak, failed, restricted and metadata-only sources are reported, so a thin set looks thin.

AI chats are context

A captured ChatGPT or Claude conversation is cited separately as AI-generated context, never as independent evidence. A chat-only set is tagged Provisional.

Open questions are output

What the set doesn’t settle is a listed section, not an omission you have to notice yourself.

What you can do next

From this brief
  1. Source Summary Brief
each move below starts here
    1. Add sources
    2. variant 2

    Add more captured tabs or let SourceFrame discover sources. The re-read set produces a new variant next to the original.

    1. Turn into…
    2. Recommendation Brief

    When the reading has to produce a decision. There is no direct Source Summary Brief → Comparison Brief workflow action — a Comparison Brief needs named options.

    1. Ask
    2. Create draft

    Interrogate the set with Sources only, or write it up as a draft with the evidence still attached.

From Source Summary Brief

  • Easily confused with

    Source Brief

    Same sources, but it answers a question you asked instead of describing the set.

  • If the conflict is the point

    Source Comparison Brief

    When you care less about themes and more about exactly where the sources agree and diverge.

  • Use it for

    Summarize a source set

    The capture-first job, from selecting tabs to reading the result in the web app.

Turn the reading you’ve already done into one brief.

Free plan · No card required
Get the extension

This type usually starts from tabs you already have open.